Independent Medical Exam

in Chicago, Atlanta, and Fort Lauderdale

Request Appointment

Dr. Steven Gaskell at Psycholegal Assessments, Inc. offers forensic psychological evaluations for insurance companies and attorneys in disability insurance matters, workman’s compensation, personal injury (tort) cases, and Independent Medical Examinations (IME). Specific types of tort cases include, but are not limited to: motor vehicle and other accidents; sexual harassment; employer misconduct; sexual abuse claims against defendant’s holding positions of special trust; civil rights issues, medical and psychological malpractice; critiquing reports from opposing expert witnesses; and trial consulting.

An Independent Medical Exam (IME) is when a psychologist who has not previously been involved in a person’s care examines an individual. There is not a therapist-patient relationship. IMEs may be conducted to determine the cause, extent and medical treatment of a work-related or other injury where liability is at issue; whether an individual has reached maximum benefit from treatment; and whether any permanent impairment remains after treatment. An Independent Medical Exam (IME) may be conducted at the request of an employer, an insurance carrier, or a law firm to obtain an independent opinion of the clinical status of the individual. Workers’ compensation insurance carriers, auto insurance carriers, and self-insured employers have a legal right to this request.

An Independent Medical Exam (IMEs) is requested for several reasons. The individual may have been in treatment for an extended period of time and there is concern regarding whether the treatment continues to be medically indicated, whether treatment will be required for an extended period into the future, whether continued treatment is related to a specific event, or whether there are any permanent disabilities as a result of the trauma. Since an Independent Medical Exam (IME) is usually requested in connection with traumatic injury and litigation, the question also arises regarding whether there is any indication of malingering. Independent Medical Exam (IME) Psychological Evaluations can be completed throughout Illinois, Georgia, Florida, and Arizona.

The psychologist completing an Independent Medical Exam (IME) is typically engaged by either the insurance carrier or the defendant in a litigation case. As such, the individual being evaluated is not always completely candid with the evaluator, and at times there is a hostile relationship, involving considerable suspicion. Statements regarding injuries are not taken at face value. Regardless of the referral source, the individual will be examined for signs of the symptoms reported and symptom validity testing will be conducted in all cases. The completion of an Independent Medical Exam (IME) requires diligence and a systematic approach to evaluation of historical information, the individual's claims, as well as a comprehensive examination using objective psychological testing.

An Independent Medical Exam (IME) involves:

  • Review of relevant medical and psychological treatment records to assess pre-injury (physical or psychological) and post-injury functioning and examining preexisting conditions.
  • Evaluating the course of the injury, illness, or mental disorders
  • Relevant background information: personal history, education and employment history, mental health history, substance abuse history, social history, and medical history
  • Clinical interview with individual. The individual's report will be compared to their prior reports and other documentation in the record.
  • Collateral records (and Collateral interviews, as needed) regarding the individual's pre-injury and post-injury functioning
  • Distinguish subjective complaints from objective findings
  • Psychological testing involving evaluation of general psychopathology, personality factors, intellectual functioning and trauma
  • Symptom validity assessment and the psychological assessment of exaggeration, malingering and deception
  • Prognosis and treatment recommendations, as applicable.
Image

IME Evaluations can be completed by videoconference through Doxy.me, which is as easy to use as Skype or FaceTime, but is secure and HIPAA compliant.

For other types of expert forensic psychological evaluations refer to https://psycholegalassessments.com/


Areas of Expertise


Competency to Stand Trial Psychological Evaluation - Psycholegal Assessments, Inc.
Competency to Stand Trial
Competency to Stand Trial, also known as Fitness to Stand Trial, is imperative for ensuring that a defendant can comprehend the nature and objective of the legal actions against them and actively cooperate with their defense attorney.
Sex Offender Psychosexual Evaluation
Psychosexual Evaluations
Psychosexual evaluations of sex offenders incorporate a comprehensive risk assessment utilizing actuarial instruments and other research-supported risk and protective factors. Notably, recidivism rates vary among sex offenders, with a significant portion never being re-convicted post-initial conviction.
Criminal Responsibility Psychological Evaluations - Psycholegal Assessments, Inc.
Criminal Responsibility
Criminal responsibility or sanity evaluations are critical when a defendant’s mental state at the time of committing an offense is in question. These evaluations can be initiated by the court, defense, or prosecution to establish a clear understanding of the defendant’s mental condition during the crime.
Independent Medical Examination Psychological Evaluation - Psycholegal Assessments, Inc.
Independent Medical Exam
An Independent Medical Exam is conducted by a psychologist without prior involvement in the individual’s care, ensuring an objective assessment without a therapist-patient relationship.
Miran
Miranda Rights & Confession Issues
The role of confessions and self-incriminating statements in criminal cases cannot be understated. Confessions are produced in about 50% of criminal cases, where suspects who provide self-incriminating statements are 26% more likely to be found guilty and convicted (Leo, 2006).
Malingering and Deception
Malingering and Deception
In the legal realm, psychological assessments can be compromised by malingering or deception, with individuals potentially presenting themselves dishonestly during interviews and tests to influence the outcome.
Image
Mitigating Factors
Mitigating factors consider the defendant’s mental state and historical mental disorders or psychological trauma, even when these do not qualify for an insanity defense, to argue for a reduced sentence. The contributions of evaluations and reports by experts like Dr. Steven Gaskell are vital for presenting such evidence.
Guilty But Mentally Ill Psychological Evaluation - Psycholegal Assessments, Inc.
Guilty But Mentally Ill (GBMI)
Introduced first in Michigan in 1975, the GBMI verdict was proposed to diminish the success rate of insanity defenses, offering a compromise verdict that, while seemingly compassionate, subjects the defendant to the same penalties as a guilty verdict.

Video Conferencing Available!

Psychological evaluations are now able to be completed by HIPAA compliant video conferencing.
Request a Video Call!